Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>
From: Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>
To: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-05-05T11:39:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- table9.1-devel.png (image/png)
- table9.1-align-right.png (image/png)
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:22 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I've now completed updating chapter 9 for the new layout, > and the results are visible at > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions.html > There is more to do --- for instance, various contrib modules > have function/operator tables that should be synced with this > design. But this seemed like a good place to pause and reflect. > Would it be premature to complain about the not-that-great look of Table 9.1 now? Compare the two attached images: the screenshot from https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-comparison.html vs the GIMP-assisted pipe dream of mine to align it to the right edge of the table cell. I don't have the faintest idea how to achieve that using SGML at the moment, but it just looks so much nicer to me. ;-) Regards, -- Alex
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed