Re: BUG #15789: libpq compilation with OpenSSL 1.1.1b fails on Windows with Visual Studio 2017

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
wrote:

>
> Could you add your patch to the upcoming commit fest please?  Here it
> is:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/
>
>
Sure, done as  [1]. The attached patch is still for 11, will it be back
patched?


>
> +   # Startint at version 1.1.0 OpenSSL have changed their library names
> from:
> +   #     libeay to libcrypto
> +   #     ssleay to libssl
>
> s/startint/starting/
> Are these from the installers we recommend in the docs?  I mean these
> ones:
> https://slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
>
>
The change in the library names comes directly from OpenSSL [2].


> +   if (-e "$self->{options}->{openssl}/lib/VC/libssl32MD.lib")
> Why not using a version-specific logic here?
>
>
The version logic is just before that:

+ my ($major, $minor) = $self->GetOpenSSLVersion();
+ if ($major == 1 && $minor == 1)

I guess that what you mean is, why testing the 32/64 bits using the
libraries instead of using the 'platform'? I try to make it clearer in this
version.


> +   my ($major, $minor) = $self->GetOpenSSLVersion();
> +   if ($major == 1 && $minor == 1)
> +   {
> +       print $o "#define HAVE_BIO_GET_DATA 1\n";
> +       print $o "#define HAVE_BIO_METH_NEW 1\n";
> +   }
> I think that you are missing HAVE_OPENSSL_INIT_SSL and
> HAVE_ASN1_STRING_GET0_DATA here.  Please see commit message of
> bde64eb.
>
>
Yes, you are right. Since those do not break the compilation between 1.0.2
and 1.1.0 I did not notice them.

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2134/
[2] https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/2016-August/008351.html