Re: BUG #17254: Crash with 0xC0000409 in pg_stat_statements when pg_stat_tmp\pgss_query_texts.stat exceeded 2GB.

Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>

From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: egashira.yusuke@fujitsu.com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-10-30T18:31:05Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 6:26 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

>
> That seems like a pretty poor solution.  It will cause pg_stat_statements
> to fail altogether as soon as the stats file exceeds 1GB.  (Admittedly,
> failing is better than crashing, but not by that much.)  Worse, it causes
> that to happen on EVERY platform, not only Windows where the problem is.
>
> I don't think it is a Windows only problem, even on POSIX platforms it
might not be safe trying to read() over 2GB.


> I think instead, we need to turn the subsequent one-off read() call into a
> loop that reads no more than INT_MAX bytes at a time.  It'd be possible
> to restrict that to Windows, but probably no harm in doing it the same
> way everywhere.
>
> Seems reasonable to me, can such a change be back-patched?


> A different line of thought is that maybe we shouldn't be letting the
> file get so big in the first place.  Letting every backend have its
> own copy of a multi-gigabyte stats file is going to be problematic,
> and not only on Windows.  It looks like the existing logic just considers
> the number of hash table entries, not their size ... should we rearrange
> things to keep a running count of the space used?
>
> +1. There should be a mechanism to limit the effective memory size.

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha

Commits

  1. Don't try to read a multi-GB pg_stat_statements file in one call.