Horton
Menu

Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation

Sameer Thakur <samthakur74@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Sameer Thakur <samthakur74@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-12-04T08:30:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> >I've cleaned this up - revision attached - and marked it "ready for
> committer".
> Thank you for this.
>
  I did the basic hygiene test. The patch applies correctly and compiles
with no warnings. Did not find anything broken in basic functionality.
  In the documentation i have a minor suggestion of replacing phrase "might
judge to be a non-distinct " with ->" may judge to be non-  distinct".

regards
Sameer




--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pg-stat-statements-calls-under-estimation-propagation-tp5738128p5781577.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Improve management of "sticky" entries in contrib/pg_stat_statements.