Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
From: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-08-13T04:27:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 2:40 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I agree. So, following the above points and some off-list discussions, I have > revised the option to be a subscription option in the V60 version. > Thanks Hou-san for the patches. I have tested the patches and are working as expected. I've a minor comment for patch v60-0001. @@ -4642,6 +4791,10 @@ adjust_xid_advance_interval(RetainDeadTuplesData *rdt_data, bool new_xid_found) */ rdt_data->xid_advance_interval = Min(rdt_data->xid_advance_interval * 2, max_interval); + + /* Ensure the wait time remains within the maximum limit */ + rdt_data->xid_advance_interval = Min(rdt_data->xid_advance_interval, + The function comment needs an update as per above change. Currently, it says - * The interval is reset to a minimum value of 100ms once there is some * activity on the node. But if MySubscription->maxconflretention is < 100ms, then it will be set to maxconflretention value and not 100ms. -- Thanks, Nisha