Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
Attachments
- v64-0001-Introduce-inactive_timeout-based-replication-slo.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v64-0001
- v64-0002-Add-TAP-test-for-slot-invalidation-based-on-inac.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v64-0002
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 3:26 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 11:05 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think we are often too quick to throw out perfectly good tests. > > Citing that some similar GUCs don't do testing as a reason to skip > > them just seems to me like an example of "two wrongs don't make a > > right". > > > > There is a third option. > > > > Keep the tests. Because they take excessive time to run, that simply > > means you should run them *conditionally* based on the PG_TEST_EXTRA > > environment variable so they don't impact the normal BF execution. The > > documentation [1] says this env var is for "resource intensive" tests > > -- AFAIK this is exactly the scenario we find ourselves in, so is > > exactly what this env var was meant for. > > > > Search other *.pl tests for PG_TEST_EXTRA to see some examples. > > > > I don't see the long-running tests to be added under PG_TEST_EXTRA as > that will make it unusable after some point. Now, if multiple senior > members feel it is okay to add long-running tests under PG_TEST_EXTRA > then I am open to considering it. We can keep this test as a separate > patch so that the patch is being tested in CI or in manual tests > before commit. > Please find the attached v64 patches. The changes in this version w.r.t. older patch v63 are as - - The changes from the v63-0001 patch have been moved to a separate thread [1]. - The v63-0002 patch has been split into two parts in v64: 1) 001 patch: Implements the main feature - inactive timeout-based slot invalidation. 2) 002 patch: Separates the TAP test "044_invalidate_inactive_slots" as suggested above. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABdArM6pBL5hPnSQ%2B5nEVMANcF4FCH7LQmgskXyiLY75TMnKpw%40mail.gmail.com -- Thanks, Nisha