Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
Attachments
- v71-0001-Introduce-inactive_timeout-based-replication-slo.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v71-0001
- v71-0002-Add-TAP-test-for-slot-invalidation-based-on-inac.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v71-0002
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:17 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:02 AM Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:42 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Would it address your concern if we write the actual idle duration > > > (now - inactive_since) instead of directly using inactive_since in the > > > above message? > > > > > > > Simply using the raw timestamp difference (now - inactive_since) would > > look odd. We should convert it into a user-friendly format. Since > > idle_replication_slot_timeout is in minutes, we can express the > > difference in minutes and seconds in the log. > > For example: > > DETAIL: The slot's idle time of 1 minute and 7 seconds exceeds the > > configured "idle_replication_slot_timeout" duration. > > > > This is better but the implementation should be done on the caller > side mainly because we don't want to call a new GetCurrentTimestamp() > in ReportSlotInvalidation. > Done. > > > > > 2. > > > + * Flush all replication slots to disk. Also, invalidate obsolete slots during > > > + * non-shutdown checkpoint. > > > * > > > * It is convenient to flush dirty replication slots at the time of checkpoint. > > > * Additionally, in case of a shutdown checkpoint, we also identify the slots > > > @@ -1924,6 +2007,45 @@ CheckPointReplicationSlots(bool is_shutdown) > > > > > > Can we try and see how the patch looks if we try to invalidate the > > > slot due to idle time at the same time when we are trying to > > > invalidate due to WAL? > > > > > > > I'll consider the suggested change in the next version. > > > Done the changes as suggested in v71. > FYI, we discussed this previously (1), but the conclusion that it > won't help much (as it will not help to remove WAL immediately) is > incorrect, especially if we do what is suggested now. > > Apart from this, I have made minor changes in the comments. Please > review and include them unless you disagree. > Done. ~~~~ Here are the v71 patches with the above comments incorporated. -- Thanks, Nisha