Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:28 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> There was one pending open comment #6 from [1]. This has been
> addressed in the attached patch.
Thank you for the patches, here are my comments for patch-004: sequencesync.c
copy_sequences()
-------------------
1)
+ if (first)
+ first = false;
+ else
+ appendStringInfoString(seqstr, ", ");
We can avoid additional variable here, suggestion -
if (seqstr->len > 0)
appendStringInfoString(seqstr, ", ");
~~~~
2)
+ else
+ {
+ *sequence_sync_error = true;
+ append_mismatched_sequences(mismatched_seqs, seqinfo);
+ }
I think *sequence_sync_error = true can be removed from here, as we
can avoid setting it for every mismatch, as it is already set at the
end of the function if any sequence mismatches are found.
~~~~
3)
+ if (message_level_is_interesting(DEBUG1))
+ {
+ /* LOG all the sequences synchronized during current batch. */
+ for (int i = 0; i < curr_batch_seq_count; i++)
+ {
+ LogicalRepSequenceInfo *done_seq;
...
+
+ ereport(DEBUG1,
+ errmsg_internal("logical replication synchronization for
subscription \"%s\", sequence \"%s\" has finished",
+ get_subscription_name(subid, false),
+ done_seq->seqname));
+ }
+ }
3a) I think the DEBUG1 log can be moved inside the while loop just
above, to avoid traversing the list again unnecessarily.
~~~~
LogicalRepSyncSequences():
-----------------------------
4)
+ /*
+ * Sequence synchronization failed due to a parameter mismatch. Set the
+ * failure time to prevent immediate initiation of the sequencesync
+ * worker.
+ */
+ if (sequence_sync_error)
+ {
+ logicalrep_seqsyncworker_set_failuretime();
+ ereport(LOG,
+ errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
+ errmsg("sequence synchronization failed because the parameters
between the publisher and subscriber do not match for all
sequences"));
+ }
I think saying "sequence synchronization failed" could be misleading,
as the matched sequences will still be synced successfully. It might
be clearer to reword it to something like:
"sequence synchronization failed for some sequences because the
parameters between the publisher and subscriber do not match."
~~~~
--
Thanks,
Nisha