Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications
Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
From: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>,
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-07-03T16:45:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 2:34 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 3:54 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 3:42 PM Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > During tests, I found one behavior that needs discussion: > > > > > > Consider a partition hierarchy where the root table is in schema s2, a > > > child partition is in schema s1, and the publication includes both > > > schemas but excludes only the root table. > > > > This is the exact scenario I had in mind when reviewing > > 'get_rel_sync_entry-->GetTopMostAncestorInPublication' flow, thus I > > suggested adding comments about intentionally fetching the 'Exclude > > list' only for the Root. I was about to test it in my next review > > cycle. > > > > The first thought is that if root is excluded, the partition should > > also be excluded to maintain consistency with the 'ALL TABLES Except > > ROOT' behaviour. But then it needs to be documented too. > > > > +1. It is good to be consistent here with similar ALL TABLES case. > BTW, as we can't exclude the child table explicitly, this anyway seems > like the only option because otherwise, users won't have any way to > exclude the child table. > I've updated the related comments in v18 and also updated the CREATE PUBLICATION docs to clarify this behavior. -- Thanks, Nisha
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Clarify that publication exclusions track table identity.
- 77b6dd909252 19 (unreleased) cited