Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:17 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:05 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> So, I think we need to open the file in binary mode as in other parts
> >> >> of the code.  The attached patch fixes the problem for me.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thoughts?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yikes. Yes, I believe you are correct, and that looks like the
> correct fix.
> >> >
> >> > I wonder why this was not caught on the buildfarm. We do have
> regression tests for it, AFAIK?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I am not able to find regression tests for it, but maybe I am not
> >> seeing it properly.  By any chance, you have removed it during revert
> >> of ""Allow on-line enabling and disabling of data checksums".
> >>
> >
> > Oh meh. You are right, it's in the reverted patch, I was looking in the
> wrong branch :/ Sorry about that. And that certainly explains why we don't
> have it.
> >
>
> Okay.  I will commit this in a day or so after once verifying it on
> PG11 as well.  I think this needs to be backpatched, let me know if
> you think otherwise.
>
>
Definitely a bug so yes, it needs backpatching.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>