Re: 10.0

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@8kdata.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 14/05/16 20:02, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>
>> +1 for going with 10.0 after 9.6 and 11.0 afterwards, etc.
>>
>> It will hopefully both end these discussions and remove the confusion the
>> current versioning scheme has (I too heard way to many times about people
>> using postgres8 or postgres9).
>>
>
>     Even worse: I've been told that a company was using "PostgreSQL 8.5"
> ^_^


That's not necessarily the version numbers fault. That's them using an
alpha version.. (Yes, I've run into a customer just a couple of years ago
that were still on 8.5 alpha)

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/