Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is an initial set of patches related to OpenSSL 1.1. Everything
> should
> > still build fine on older OpenSSL versions (and did when I tested with
> > 1.0.2h).
> >
> > 0001-Fixes-for-compiling-with-OpenSSL-1.1.patch
> >
> > This patch fixes the code so it builds with OpenSSL 1.1 (except the
> > CRYPTO_LOCK issue I have reported to the OpenSSL team).
> >
> > - Makes our configure script check for SSL_new instead
> > - Uses functions instead of direct access to struct members
> >
> > 0002-Define-CRYPTO_LOCK-for-OpenSSL-1.1-compat.patch
> >
> > Fix for the removal of the CRYPTO_LOCK define. I am trying to convince
> them
> > to add the define back. :)
> >
> > 0003-Remove-OpenSSL-1.1-deprecation-warnings.patch
> >
> > Silence all warnings. This commit changes more things and is not
> necessary
> > for getting PostgreSQL to build against 1.1.
> >
> > - Silences deprecation other warnings related to that OpenSSL 1.1 now 1)
> > automatically initializes the library and 2) no longer uses the locking
> > callback.
> > - Silences deprecation warning when generating DH parameters.
>
> Those patches are going to need a careful review by looking at the
> areas they are changing, and a backpatch. On Arch there is no test
> package available except in AUR. And that's the pre3 release, OpenSSL
> folks are on pre5 now with their beta2. It would be annoying to
> compile it manually, but if there is no other way... Is Debian up to
> date with 1.1.0 beta2 in its snapshot packages?
>

Debian testing is still on 1.0.2h.
Debian experimental is on 1.1.0pre5.

Not sure here beta2 enters the discussion, it's not mentioned anywhere on
their site?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/