Re: xlog location arithmetic

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-04T11:26:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 00:53, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
<euler@timbira.com> wrote:
> On 25-02-2012 09:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Do we even *need* the validate_xlog_location() function? If we just
>> remove those calls, won't we still catch all the incorrectly formatted
>> ones in the errors of the sscanf() calls? Or am I too deep into
>> weekend-mode and missing something obvious?
>>
> sscanf() is too fragile for input sanity check. Try
> pg_xlog_location_diff('12/3', '-10/0'), for example. I won't object removing
> that function if you protect xlog location input from silly users.

Ah, good point. No, that's the reason I was missing :-)

Patch applied, thanks!

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/