Horton

Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

View thread
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: 曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, "movead.li@highgo.ca" <movead.li@highgo.ca>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>, tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-11-26T10:44:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.

  2. Remove temporary files after backend crash

  3. Fix comment in indexing.c

  4. Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:16 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 4:05 PM 曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com> wrote:
> >
> > I found that the new Patch mail failed to register to Commitfest
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/28/2349/#
> > I don't know what's wrong and how to check it?
> > Could you help me figure it out?
>
> Apparently the attachment in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/A3F1EBD9-E694-4384-8049-37B09308491B@alibaba-inc.com
> wasn't detected.  I have no idea why, maybe Magnus will know.
> Otherwise you could try to ask on -www.

Not offhand. The email appeas to have a fairly complex nested mime
structure, so something in the python library that parses the MIME
decides that it's not there. For some reason the email is 7 parts. 1
is the signature, the rest seems complexly nested. And the attachment
seems to be squeezed in between two different HTML parts.

Basically, at the top it's multipart/alternative, which says there are
two choices. One is text/plain, which is what the archives uses. The
other is a combination of text/html followed by
application/octetstream (the patch) followed by another text/html.

The archives picks the first alternative, which is text/plain, which
does not contain the attachment. The attachment only exists in the
HTML view.

I think the easiest solution is to re-send as plain text email with
the attachment, which would then put the attachment on the email
itself instead of embedded in the HTML, I would guess.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/