Re: Online enabling of checksums
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Date: 2018-02-23T18:35:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2/22/18 12:38, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I'm not entirely sure which the others ones are. Auto-Vacuum obviously > > is one, which doesn't use the worker infrastructure. But I'm not sure > > which the others are referring to? > > autovacuum, subscription workers, auto prewarm > > Oh, for some reason I thought you were thinking in pending patches. Yeah, for those it makes sense -- though autovacuum isn't (currently) using background workers for what it does, the rest certainly makes sense to do something with. But as you say, that's a separate patch :) -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
Commits
-
Online enabling and disabling of data checksums
- f19c0eccae96 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Deactive flapping checksum isolation tests.
- bf75fe47e444 11.0 landed
-
Add support for coordinating record typmods among parallel workers.
- cc5f81366c36 11.0 cited