Re: Online enabling of checksums

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Date: 2018-02-23T18:35:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> On 2/22/18 12:38, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure which the others ones are. Auto-Vacuum obviously
> > is one, which doesn't use the worker infrastructure. But I'm not sure
> > which the others are referring to?
>
> autovacuum, subscription workers, auto prewarm
>
>
Oh, for some reason I thought you were thinking in pending patches. Yeah,
for those it makes sense -- though autovacuum isn't (currently) using
background workers for what it does, the rest certainly makes sense to do
something with.

But as you say, that's a separate patch :)


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

Commits

  1. Online enabling and disabling of data checksums

  2. Deactive flapping checksum isolation tests.

  3. Add support for coordinating record typmods among parallel workers.