Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:13 AM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:

> On 2/16/19 5:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2019-01-05 13:19:20 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> >>> On 12/12/2018 05:31, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>>> Most of the features I've been involved in removing have been
> >>>> deprecated for 5+ years.  The first release where this one was
> >>>> deprecated was only 2 years ago.  So it feels dramatically faster to
> >>>> me than what I think we have typically done.
> >>>
> >>> I was just looking this up as well, and I find it too fast.  The
> >>> nonexclusive backups were introduced in 9.6.  So I'd say that we could
> >>> remove the exclusive ones when 9.5 goes EOL.  (That would mean this
> >>> patch could be submitted for PostgreSQL 13, since 9.5 will go out of
> >>> support around the time PG13 would be released.)
> >>
> >> I don't agree with either the notion that we have to wait 5 years in
> >> this case or that we've only had a good alternative to the exclusive
> >> backup mode since 9.5 as we've had pg_basebackup since 9.1.
> >
> > I don't agree with a general 5 year deprecation window either. But it
> > seems pretty clear that there's no majority for removing exclusive
> > backups in v12.   I think it'd be good to make the warning about its
> > impending death more explicit, but otherwise mark this CF entry either
> > as rejected or returned with feedback.
>
> I think there is support for the patch in PG13 so I was planning to move
> it out of the March CF to the first PG13 CF as soon as the app will
> allow it, i.e., once there is only a single open CF.
>
>
Agreed, and I think we should also update the documentation for 12 with the
suggested more explicit mention of the deprecation.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>