Horton

Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-27T15:20:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck <
> michael.banck@credativ.de>
> > wrote:
> >> ISTM the consensus is that there should be no output in regular mode,
> >> but a message should be displayed in verbose and progress mode.
>
> > Agreed, and applied as one patch.
>
> Is there an argument for back-patching this?
>

Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.

I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your
comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Commits

  1. Back-patch checkpoint clarification docs and pg_basebackup updates