Re: Patch to allow users to kill their own queries
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-01-15T14:41:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 14:46, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 14:42, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 01/03/2012 12:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>> Noah Misch<noah@leadboat.com> writes: >>> >>>> >>>> Regarding the other message, avoid composing a translated message from >>>> independently-translated parts. >>>> >>> >>> Yes. I haven't looked at the patch, but I wonder whether it wouldn't be >>> better to dodge both of these problems by having the subroutine return a >>> success/failure result code, so that the actual ereport can be done at >>> an outer level where the full message (and hint) can be written >>> directly. >>> >> >> >> Between your and Noah's comments I understand the issue and likely direction >> to sort this out now. Bounced forward to the next CommitFest and back on my >> plate again. Guess I'll be learning new and exciting things about >> translation this week. > > I should say that I have more or less finished this one off, since I > figured you were working on more important things. Just a final round > of cleanup and commit left, really, so you can take it off your plate > again if you want to :-) Finally, to end the bikeshedding, I've applied this patch after another round of fairly extensive changes. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/