Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-08-26T15:14:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Aug 26, 2016 5:13 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > On 08/25/2016 07:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am relaunching $subject as 10 development will begin soon. As far as >> I know, there is agreement that we can do something here. Among the >> different proposals I have found: >> - pg_clog renamed to pg_commit_status, pg_xact or pg_commit >> - pg_xlog renamed to pg_xjournal, pg_wal or pg_journal > > > I think the use of the pg_ prefix is redundant. Just a directory called: wal will do (for example). > > In reference to pg_xlog specifically, it should be wal. It is the Write Ahead Log, not the Journal (although I recognize they can be synonymous). All the documentation talks about Write Ahead Log. > Yes, let's avoid inventing a *third* name for it, please. It's already bad enough that we have both wal and xlog. /Magnus
Commits
-
Rename "pg_clog" directory to "pg_xact".
- 88e66d193fba 10.0 landed
-
Improve error reporting in pg_upgrade's file copying/linking/rewriting.
- f002ed2b8e45 10.0 cited