Horton

Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>

View thread
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-05-10T14:43:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Argh. This thread appears to have been forgotten - sorry about that.
>
> Given that we're taling about a potential protocol change, we really
> should resolve this before we wrap beta, no?

Had a chat with Heikki about this, and we came to the conslusion that
we don't actually have to fix it befor ebeta. Because pg_basebackup is
going to have to consider 9.1 servers anyway, and we can just treat
9.2beta1 as being a 9.1 from this perspective.

We still have to fix it, but it' snot as urgent :-)

FWIW, the main plan we're onto is still to add the GUCs on new
connections to walsender, so we have something to work with...

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/