Re: PoC: Partial sort
Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
From: Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
To: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-01-18T17:32:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Funny, I just wrote a patch to do that some minutes ago (didn't see your email yet). http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABRT9RCK=wmFUYZdqU_+MOFW5PDevLxJmZ5B=eTJJNUBvyARxw@mail.gmail.com Regards, Marti On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> wrote: > On 13/01/14 18:01, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >> Thanks. It's included into attached version of patch. As wall as >> estimation >> improvements, more comments and regression tests fix. >> > > Would it be possible to totally separate the two sets of sort-keys, > only giving the non-index set to the tuplesort? At present tuplesort > will, when it has a group to sort, make wasted compares on the > indexed set of keys before starting on the non-indexed set. > -- > Cheers, > Jeremy > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
Commits
-
Implement Incremental Sort
- d2d8a229bc58 13.0 landed
-
Improve memory management for external sorts.
- 0011c0091e88 9.6.0 cited