Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
From: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>
Date: 2025-12-30T06:19:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v11-0002-Add-MODE-option-to-WAIT-FOR-LSN-command.patch (application/octet-stream)
- v11-0001-Extend-xlogwait-infrastructure-with-write-and-fl.patch (application/octet-stream)
- v11-0003-Add-tab-completion-for-WAIT-FOR-LSN-MODE-option.patch (application/octet-stream)
- v11-0004-Use-WAIT-FOR-LSN-in-PostgreSQL-Test-Cluster-wait.patch (application/octet-stream)
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 11:25 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 30, 2025, at 11:14, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 2025-Dec-27, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 4:25 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> 2 - 0002
> >>> ```
> >>> + else
> >>> + ereport(ERROR,
> >>> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> >>> + errmsg("unrecognized value for WAIT option \"%s\": \"%s\"",
> >>> + "MODE", mode_str),
> >>> ```
> >>>
> >>> I wonder why don’t we directly put MODE into the error message?
> >>
> >> Yeah, putting MODE into the error message is cleaner. It's done in v8.
> >
> > The reason not to do that (and also put WAIT in a separate string) is so
> > that the message is identicla to other messages and thus requires no
> > separate translation, specifically
> > errmsg("unrecognized value for %s option \"%s\": \"%s\"", ...)
> >
> > See commit 502e256f2262. Please use that form.
> >
>
> To follow 502e256f2262, it should use “%s” for “WAIT” as well. I raised the comment because I saw “WAIT” is the format strings, thus “MODE” can be there as well.
>
> So, we should do a similar change like:
> ```
> - errmsg("unrecognized value for EXPLAIN option \"%s\": \"%s\"",
> - opt->defname, p),
> + errmsg("unrecognized value for %s option \"%s\": \"%s\"",
> + "EXPLAIN", opt->defname, p),
> ```
>
Thanks for raising this and clarifying the rationale. I've made the
modification per your input.
--
Best,
Xuneng