Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:


> That makes sense to me.  The reason I didn't make that change when I
> added the serializable special case to pg_dump was that it seemed
> like a separate question; I didn't want to complicate an already big
> patch with unnecessary changes to non-serializable transactions.
>

If we agree, should we change that now ?

Thanks,
Pavan