Re: pg_dump: sortDumpableObjectsByTypeName() doesn't always do that
Jacob Champion <pchampion@pivotal.io>
From: Jacob Champion <pchampion@pivotal.io>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-06T19:23:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Do you mean "incorrect results", or just "unstable results"? > If the former, what's incorrect about it? Incorrect, as in "the results are not sorted by type name." Here's an example ordering that we saw -- but note that you won't be able to repro since it relies on the Greenplum bug I mentioned. ... pg_catalog.xlogloc_ops public._tmp_table public.a public.a_star <null>.abstime date <null>.abstime int4 <null>.abstime time <null>.abstime timestamp <null>.abstime timestamptz gporca_faults.foo ... You can see the inversion between public._tmp_table (which is TABLE DATA) and gporca_faults.foo (which is also TABLE DATA). I can try to work on a Postgres-specific test case if you'd like, but since the root cause is that we're not defining a valid ordering, quicksort may or may not behave consistently for test purposes. We got "lucky" here; otherwise we'd never have noticed. --Jacob
Commits
-
Ensure pg_dump_sort.c sorts null vs non-null namespace consistently.
- f7364300667b 11.0 landed
- f3f6558b5d76 9.5.15 landed
- dc391dacf170 10.6 landed
- abd04e0dd8a5 9.4.20 landed
- 6b6327d938ed 9.6.11 landed
- 5b5ed4756c9b 12.0 landed
- 5abdb33ad053 9.3.25 landed
-
Last-minute updates for release notes.
- e0ee93053998 12.0 cited