Thread
Commits
-
doc: Mention AttributeRelationId in FDW validator function description
- b901961be1d5 12.18 landed
- d2580bc312d9 13.14 landed
- 020e4a17f0ff 14.11 landed
- 296128a53646 15.6 landed
- a78b0b3dcf58 16.2 landed
- f246c48ac4ac 17.0 landed
-
doc patch: note AttributeRelationId passed to FDW validator function
Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> — 2023-06-07T00:08:51Z
Hi Here: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/fdw-functions.html the enumeration of OIDs which might be passed as the FDW validator function's second argument omits "AttributeRelationId" (as passed when altering a foreign table's column options). Attached v1 patch adds this to this list of OIDs. The alternative v2 patch adds this to this list of OIDs, and also formats it as an SGML list, which IMHO is easier to read. Looks like this has been missing since 9.3. Regards Ian Barwick
-
Re: doc patch: note AttributeRelationId passed to FDW validator function
Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> — 2023-12-28T04:55:27Z
2023年6月7日(水) 9:08 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>: > > Hi > > Here: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/fdw-functions.html > > the enumeration of OIDs which might be passed as the FDW validator function's > second argument omits "AttributeRelationId" (as passed when altering > a foreign table's column options). > > Attached v1 patch adds this to this list of OIDs. > > The alternative v2 patch adds this to this list of OIDs, and also > formats it as an > SGML list, which IMHO is easier to read. > > Looks like this has been missing since 9.3. Forgot to add this to a CF; done: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4730/ Regards Ian Barwick
-
Re: doc patch: note AttributeRelationId passed to FDW validator function
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2023-12-28T06:37:16Z
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 01:55:27PM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > 2023年6月7日(水) 9:08 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>: >> The alternative v2 patch adds this to this list of OIDs, and also >> formats it as an >> SGML list, which IMHO is easier to read. >> >> Looks like this has been missing since 9.3. > > Forgot to add this to a CF; done: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4730/ Agreed that a list is cleaner. Looking around I can see that the catalogs going through the validator functions are limited to the five you are listing in your patch. Will apply in a bit, thanks! -- Michael
-
Re: doc patch: note AttributeRelationId passed to FDW validator function
Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> — 2023-12-28T12:46:12Z
2023年12月28日(木) 15:37 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 01:55:27PM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > > 2023年6月7日(水) 9:08 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>: > >> The alternative v2 patch adds this to this list of OIDs, and also > >> formats it as an > >> SGML list, which IMHO is easier to read. > >> > >> Looks like this has been missing since 9.3. > > > > Forgot to add this to a CF; done: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4730/ > > Agreed that a list is cleaner. Looking around I can see that the > catalogs going through the validator functions are limited to the five > you are listing in your patch. Will apply in a bit, thanks! Thanks for taking care of that! Regards Ian Barwick