Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
From: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
To: Dag Lem <dag@nimrod.no>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-11-30T12:56:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Avoid using non-ASCII commentary in daitch_mokotoff.c.
- 1c54b93a8cf9 16.0 landed
-
Remove some non-ASCII symbols from a comment.
- d6b5dee42de7 16.0 landed
-
Remove useless dependencies in daitch_mokotoff_header.pl.
- 2bfbad9c4220 16.0 landed
-
Pacify perlcritic.
- edc627ae2763 16.0 landed
-
Add support for Daitch-Mokotoff Soundex in contrib/fuzzystrmatch.
- a290378a3752 16.0 landed
-
Enable routine running of citext's UTF8-specific test cases.
- c2e8bd27519f 15.0 landed
Hi Dag 2022年2月3日(木) 23:27 Dag Lem <dag@nimrod.no>: > > Hi, > > Just some minor adjustments to the patch: > > * Removed call to locale-dependent toupper() > * Cleaned up input normalization This patch was marked as "Waiting on Author" in the CommitFest entry [1] but I see you provided an updated version which hasn't received any feedback, so I've move this to the next CommitFest [2] and set it to "Needs Review". [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/40/3451/ [2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/3451/ > I have been asked to sign up to review a commitfest patch or patches - > unfortunately I've been ill with COVID-19 and it's not until now that > I feel well enough to have a look. > > Julien: I'll have a look at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/36/3468/ > as you suggested (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/36/3379/ seems to > have been reviewed now). > > If there are other suggestions for a patch or patches to review for > someone new to PostgreSQL internals, I'd be grateful for that. I see you provided some feedback on https://commitfest.postgresql.org/36/3468/, though the patch seems to have not been accepted (but not conclusively rejected either). If you still have the chance to review another patch (or more) it would be much appreciated, as there's quite a few piling up. Things like documentation or small improvements to client applications are always a good place to start. Reviews can be provided at any time, there's no need to wait for the next CommitFest. Regards Ian Barwick