Thread

  1. Wrong behaviour of array comparison when arrays contain nulls

    Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com> — 2022-04-06T12:22:45Z

    Hello,
    
    A discussion has been brought to my attention about the behaviour of H2 vs
    PostgreSQL when it comes to comparing arrays that contain NULL values, see:
    https://github.com/h2database/h2database/issues/3476
    
    For the following query:
    
    SELECT array[1, NULL] = array[1, NULL]
    
    H2 returns NULL whereas PostgreSQL returns TRUE. In my opinion and
    intuition, as well as according to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016(E) 8.2 <comparison
    predicate> GR 1) b) ii), H2 is right and PostgreSQL is wrong.
    
    On the above H2 github issue, a slack discussion was linked, to which I
    have no access, but the gist of the slack discussion was that NULL is
    *identical* to NULL according to the SQL standard, but identical doesn't
    mean equal, and the aboe 8.2 GR 1) b) ii) clearly requires all array
    elements Xi and Yi to be equal for the arrays to be equal.
    
    Best Regards,
    Lukas
    
  2. Re: Wrong behaviour of array comparison when arrays contain nulls

    Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com> — 2022-04-06T13:13:16Z

    For the record, while deviations from the standard related to ROW
    expressions are documented here:
    https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-comparisons.html#COMPOSITE-TYPE-COMPARISON
    
    This particular deviation isn't documented on that page. Might be worth
    adding?
    
    On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 2:22 PM Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com> wrote:
    
    > Hello,
    >
    > A discussion has been brought to my attention about the behaviour of H2 vs
    > PostgreSQL when it comes to comparing arrays that contain NULL values, see:
    > https://github.com/h2database/h2database/issues/3476
    >
    > For the following query:
    >
    > SELECT array[1, NULL] = array[1, NULL]
    >
    > H2 returns NULL whereas PostgreSQL returns TRUE. In my opinion and
    > intuition, as well as according to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016(E) 8.2 <comparison
    > predicate> GR 1) b) ii), H2 is right and PostgreSQL is wrong.
    >
    > On the above H2 github issue, a slack discussion was linked, to which I
    > have no access, but the gist of the slack discussion was that NULL is
    > *identical* to NULL according to the SQL standard, but identical doesn't
    > mean equal, and the aboe 8.2 GR 1) b) ii) clearly requires all array
    > elements Xi and Yi to be equal for the arrays to be equal.
    >
    > Best Regards,
    > Lukas
    >
    
  3. Re: Wrong behaviour of array comparison when arrays contain nulls

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2022-04-06T13:37:52Z

    Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com> writes:
    > For the following query:
    > SELECT array[1, NULL] = array[1, NULL]
    > H2 returns NULL whereas PostgreSQL returns TRUE. In my opinion and
    > intuition, as well as according to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016(E) 8.2 <comparison
    > predicate> GR 1) b) ii), H2 is right and PostgreSQL is wrong.
    
    If we don't impose a total order on array values, then we cannot build
    btree indexes on such columns.  So yes, this is a deviation from the
    SQL standard, and no we are not going to change it.
    
    As for documentation, section 9.19 says
    
        The comparison operators compare the array contents
        element-by-element, using the default B-tree comparison function for
        the element data type, and sort based on the first difference.
    
    which implies this behavior but perhaps could be more explicit.
    
    			regards, tom lane