Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Why not capture both items in a single select, such as in the attached
>>> > patch?
>>>
>>> Let me test this....
>>> [... A while after ...]
>>> This looks to work properly. 12 runs in a row have passed.
>>
>> Okay, applied that way.
>>
>> BTW, one-line long queries look awful in that perl code.  I don't
>> propose to change anything now, but I propose that long queries are
>> split using here-docs in new code,
>>
>> $node->safe_psql(<<EQ);
>> SELECT foo
>>   FROM bar
>> EQ
>
> Yep, that would be a good idea. I didn't know this grammar existed. Or
> use qq() directly.

hamster has not failed even once for two weeks now, so I think that
we're good. Let's see if the problem with pg_basebackup pops up once
again.
-- 
Michael