Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-01T23:32:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:26 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: > This patch is in need of a committer. Any takers? > I didn't see a lot of enthusiasm from committers on the thread Stephen at least has showed interest. > so if nobody picks it up by the end of the CF I'm going to mark the patch RWF. Yes, that makes sense. If no committer is willing to have a look at code-level and/or has room for this patch then it is as good as doomed. Except for bug fixes, I have a couple of other patches that are piling up so they would likely get the same treatment. There is nothing really we can do about that. -- Michael
Commits
-
Sync pg_dump and pg_dumpall output
- 96a7128b7b4c 10.0 landed