Re: Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-11T07:13:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > I have prepared separate patches for hash and btree index. I think > for another type of indexes, it is better to first fix the pd_lower > issue. Just wondering (sorry I have not looked at your patch in details)... Have you tested the compressibility effects of this patch on FPWs with and without wal_compression? -- Michael
Commits
-
Flag index metapages as standard-format in xlog.c calls.
- 4c11d2c559e7 11.0 landed
-
Set the metapage's pd_lower correctly in brin, gin, and spgist indexes.
- 81e334ce4e6d 11.0 landed