Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>, Vik Fearing <vik@2ndquadrant.fr>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-08-10T05:49:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> This item appears under "decisions to recheck mid-beta". If anyone is going >> to push for a change here, now is the time. > > It has been 1 week since the previous mail. I though that there were > others argued to change the behavior of old-style setting so that a > quorum commit is chosen. If nobody is going to push for a change we > can live with the current behavior? FWIW, I still see no harm in keeping backward-compatibility here, so I am in favor of a statu-quo. -- Michael
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Set the priorities of all quorum synchronous standbys to 1.
- 346199dcab4c 10.0 landed
-
Improve documentation and comment for quorum-based sync replication.
- a790ed9f69ef 10.0 landed