Horton

Re: WAL consistency check facility

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@enterprisedb.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2016-11-13T07:06:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Could we name this something like wal_consistency_checking?
>
> Otherwise it sounds like you use this to select the amount of
> consistency in the WAL (similar to, say, wal_level).

Or wal_check? Or wal_consistency_check?
-- 
Michael

Commits

  1. Minor fixes for WAL consistency checking.