Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-28T06:12:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I share your pain, but there are various things about this patch that > make me uncomfortable. I believe we are looking for an improved design > not just a different design. > > I think the best time to commit such a patch is at the beginning of a > new cycle, so people have a chance to pick out pieces they don't like > and incrementally propose changes. > > So I am going to mark this MovedToNextCF, barring objections from > committers willing to make it happen in this release. +1. -- Michael