Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@berkus.org>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-28T06:12:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I share your pain, but there are various things about this patch that
> make me uncomfortable. I believe we are looking for an improved design
> not just a different design.
>
> I think the best time to commit such a patch is at the beginning of a
> new cycle, so people have a chance to pick out pieces they don't like
> and incrementally propose changes.
>
> So I am going to mark this MovedToNextCF, barring objections from
> committers willing to make it happen in this release.

+1.
-- 
Michael