Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, "Wood, Dan" <hexpert@amazon.com>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, pgsql-committers@postgresql.org, "Wong, Yi Wen" <yiwong@amazon.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-12-07T03:08:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Put together, I propose the attached delta for 0001.
I have been looking at Andres' 0001 and your tweaks here for some time
since yesterday...
I have also performed sanity checks using all the scripts that have
accumulated on my archives for this stuff. This looks solid to me. I
have not seen failures with broken hot chains, REINDEX, etc.
> This way, an xmax that has exactly the OldestXmin value will return
> RECENTLY_DEAD rather DEAD, which seems reasonable to me (since
> OldestXmin value itself is supposed to be still possibly visible to
> somebody). Also, this way it is consistent with the other comparison to
> OldestXmin at the bottom of the function. There is no reason for the
> "else" or the extra braces.
+1. It would be nice to add a comment in the patched portion
mentioning that the new code had better match what is at the bottom of
the function.
+ else if (!MultiXactIdIsRunning(HeapTupleHeaderGetRawXmax(tuple), false))
+ {
+ /*
+ * Not in Progress, Not Committed, so either Aborted or crashed.
+ * Mark the Xmax as invalid.
+ */
+ SetHintBits(tuple, buffer, HEAP_XMAX_INVALID, InvalidTransactionId);
}
- /*
- * Not in Progress, Not Committed, so either Aborted or crashed.
- * Remove the Xmax.
- */
- SetHintBits(tuple, buffer, HEAP_XMAX_INVALID, InvalidTransactionId);
return HEAPTUPLE_LIVE;
I would find cleaner if the last "else if" is put into its own
separate if condition, and that for a multixact still running this
refers to an updating transaction aborted so hint bits are not set.
> Your commit message does a poor job of acknowledging prior work on
> diagnosing the problem starting from Dan's initial test case and patch.
(Nit: I have extracted from the test case of Dan an isolation test,
which Andres has reduced to a subset of permutations. Peter G. also
complained about what is visibly the same bug we are discussing here
but without a test case.)
--
Michael
Commits
-
Backport addition of rs_old_rel to rewriteheap's state.
- 152a56905658 9.3.21 landed
-
Perform a lot more sanity checks when freezing tuples.
- ed8e1aff6ace 9.4.16 landed
- d3044f8b0732 10.2 landed
- 986a9153b970 9.6.7 landed
- 94d1c88103ff 9.5.11 landed
- 4800f16a7ad0 9.3.21 landed
- 699bf7d05c68 11.0 landed
-
Revert bogus fixes of HOT-freezing bug
- c6764eb3aea6 11.0 landed
- f05ae2fa94b4 9.3.20 landed
- ef0339ee5dcf 9.4.15 landed
- b3888b60d3f0 9.5.10 landed
- 7a95966bc03c 10.1 landed
- 08ba67d596a1 9.6.6 landed
-
Fix traversal of half-frozen update chains
- a5736bf754c8 11.0 landed
- fc0df3bdafd6 9.5.10 landed
- d441cff14249 9.6.6 landed
- b052d524ca71 9.3.20 landed
- 8b6d85f2dc1e 9.4.15 landed
- 22576734b805 10.1 landed
-
Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple
- 46c35116ae1a 10.0 cited
- 20b655224249 11.0 cited
-
During index build, check and elog (not just Assert) for broken HOT chain.
- d70cf811f7dd 9.4.0 cited
-
Fix WAL replay of locking an updated tuple
- 6bfa88acd3df 9.4.0 cited
-
Change the way we mark tuples as frozen.
- 37484ad2aace 9.4.0 cited