Re: Random number generation, take two

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>>> Tom: I expect pademelon to fail at the configure step, complaining that
>>> "no source of strong random numbers was found". Let's wait for one
>>> cycle, to verify that it does fail like that. After that, can you add
>>> the --disable-strong-random flag to fix it, please?
>
>> Roger, I'll deal with that later today.
>
> Results seem to be as expected:
>
> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pademelon&dt=2016-12-05%2016%3A14%3A10
>
> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pademelon&dt=2016-12-05%2022%3A19%3A42

Nice to see. I'll send a rebased patch set for SCRAM soon now that we
know that things are fine here.
-- 
Michael