Horton

Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, Vik Fearing <vik@2ndquadrant.fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-07-06T11:26:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have one question; why do we call the column "conn_info" instead of
> "conninfo" which is basically used in other places? "conninfo" is better to me.

No real reason for one or the other to be honest. If you want to
change it you could just apply the attached.
-- 
Michael

Commits

  1. Add conninfo to pg_stat_wal_receiver

  2. Only show pg_stat_replication details to superusers