Horton

Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-01T04:39:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Review comments:
>> 1.
>> + bool is_partial);
>> +
>>
>> Seems additional new line is not required.
> Fixed

This patch has a patch, no new reviews. Moved to CF 2017-03.
-- 
Michael

Commits

  1. Consider parallel merge joins.

  2. Preparatory refactoring for parallel merge join support.

  3. Fix parallel hash join path search.