Re: pg_reorg in core?

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-21T13:32:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <
daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If the argument for moving pg_reorg into core is "faster and easier"
> > development, well I don't really buy that.
>
> I don't see any problem in having pg_reorg in PGXN instead.
>
> I've tried adding a META.json to the project and it seems working fine
> with the pgxn client. It is together with other patches in my own
> github fork.
>
> https://github.com/dvarrazzo/pg_reorg/
>
> I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
> the ownership.
>
Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being.
It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in
pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
-- 
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com