Horton
Menu

Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-09-09T01:28:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward
> compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum
> after introduced quorum.
> I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2,
> n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.

Considering breaking backward-compatibility in the next release does
not sound like a good idea to me for a new feature that is going to be
GA soon.
-- 
Michael

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Set the priorities of all quorum synchronous standbys to 1.

  2. Improve documentation and comment for quorum-based sync replication.