Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Cc: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-30T01:26:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:02 PM, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apart from this I have added few assert to keep eye on node->as_whichplan
> value in the attached patch, thanks.

This is still hot, moved to next CF.
-- 
Michael


Commits

  1. Update parallel.sgml for Parallel Append

  2. Support Parallel Append plan nodes.

  3. Remove BufFile's isTemp flag.

  4. Improve comments for parallel executor estimation functions.

  5. Separate reinitialization of shared parallel-scan state from ExecReScan.

  6. Eat XIDs more efficiently in recovery TAP test.

  7. Avoid syntax error on platforms that have neither LOCALE_T nor ICU.

  8. Preparatory refactoring for parallel merge join support.