Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Cc: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-30T01:26:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:02 PM, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: > Apart from this I have added few assert to keep eye on node->as_whichplan > value in the attached patch, thanks. This is still hot, moved to next CF. -- Michael
Commits
-
Update parallel.sgml for Parallel Append
- ac535cd47806 11.0 landed
- e80f2b335ecd 12.0 landed
-
Support Parallel Append plan nodes.
- ab7271677812 11.0 landed
-
Remove BufFile's isTemp flag.
- 11e264517dff 11.0 cited
-
Improve comments for parallel executor estimation functions.
- 11c1d555cebe 11.0 landed
-
Separate reinitialization of shared parallel-scan state from ExecReScan.
- 41b0dd987d44 11.0 cited
-
Eat XIDs more efficiently in recovery TAP test.
- 08aed6604de2 10.0 cited
-
Avoid syntax error on platforms that have neither LOCALE_T nor ICU.
- 457a44487328 10.0 cited
-
Preparatory refactoring for parallel merge join support.
- a71f10189dc1 10.0 cited