Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2013-06-24T22:19:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2013-06-24 09:57:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> > Otherwise I think there's not really much left to be done. Fujii? >> >> Well, other than the fact that we've not got MVCC catalog scans yet. > > That statement was only about about the patch dealing the removal of > reltoastidxid. Partially my mistake. It is not that obvious just based on the name of this thread, so I should have moved the review of this particular patch to another thread. -- Michael
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Background worker processes
- da07a1e85651 9.3.0 cited
-
Fix assorted bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- 3c84046490be 9.3.0 cited
-
Work around unportable behavior of malloc(0) and realloc(NULL, 0).
- 09ac603c36d1 9.3.0 cited
-
Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
- beb850e1d873 9.3.0 cited