Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2013-06-24T22:19:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-06-24 09:57:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> > Otherwise I think there's not really much left to be done. Fujii?
>>
>> Well, other than the fact that we've not got MVCC catalog scans yet.
>
> That statement was only about about the patch dealing the removal of
> reltoastidxid.
Partially my mistake. It is not that obvious just based on the name of
this thread, so I should have moved the review of this particular
patch to another thread.
--
Michael


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Background worker processes

  2. Fix assorted bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY.

  3. Work around unportable behavior of malloc(0) and realloc(NULL, 0).

  4. Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.