Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-25T11:22:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW, the same thing can happen when specifying an invalid replication > origin name to pg_replication_origin_advance() and > pg_replication_origin_progress(). These probably should fixed as well. I have spawned a thread about that stuff three weeks ago: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQtPg%2BLKKtzdKN26judHcvPZ0s1gNigzOT4j8CYuuuBYg%40mail.gmail.com With a patch registered where it should be: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1290/ So I would suggest to keep the discussions about this problem in its own thread. (Bonus: ALTER TABLE queries in parallel with multiple sessions and enjoy the result) -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix inadequate locking during get_rel_oids().
- 19de0ab23ccb 11.0 landed
- 2aab70205be0 10.0 landed