Horton

Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Date: 2015-12-05T11:44:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> By the way, if there are no objections, I am going to mark this patch
>> as committed in the CF app. Putting in the infrastructure is already a
>> good step forward, and I will add an entry in next CF to track the
>> patch to add tests for recovery itself. Alvaro, what do you think?
>
> Feel free to do that, but I'm likely to look into it before the next CF
> anyway.  The thread about this has been open since 2013, so that doesn't
> seem unfair.

Let's see then. For the time being I have marked this patch as
committed, and created a new entry for the set of tests regarding
standbys:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/438/
-- 
Michael

Commits

  1. Add a test framework for recovery

  2. Refactor Perl test code

  3. pgindent run for 9.5