Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-12-04T05:58:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
> pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
>
> It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
> review myself after that?

Sure, if you can get into this state, please feel free to update the
status of the patch yourself.
-- 
Michael

Commits

  1. Prefetch blocks during lazy vacuum's truncation scan

  2. Explain unaccounted for space in pgstattuple.