Thread
Commits
-
Add missing TidRangePath handling in print_path()
- 9861fe2cdd02 14.10 landed
- a0bfd6599394 15.5 landed
- 7e00466a78be 16.1 landed
- c4a1933b4847 17.0 landed
-
Missed TidRangePath in the print_path switch
Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> — 2023-09-28T05:07:48Z
Hi, The TidRangePath node was introduced three years ago. However, path printing machinery still does not support it. It isn't enjoyable to add this string of code each time. I suggest adding it now. Also, I propose not printing "???path" in the default case but throwing a warning - see the patch in the attachment. It can help to avoid such slip-ups next time. It generally makes sense to generate such long switches automatically, likewise nodeToString. -- regards, Andrey Lepikhov Postgres Professional
-
Re: Missed TidRangePath in the print_path switch
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> — 2023-09-28T10:33:14Z
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 18:07, Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > The TidRangePath node was introduced three years ago. However, path > printing machinery still does not support it. It isn't enjoyable to add > this string of code each time. I suggest adding it now. > Also, I propose not printing "???path" in the default case but throwing > a warning - see the patch in the attachment. It can help to avoid such > slip-ups next time. > It generally makes sense to generate such long switches automatically, > likewise nodeToString. Thanks for the report and patch. I'll push the fix shortly. I'll leave off the WARNING thing for now. Perhaps an Assert would draw more attention to the correct people. We can debate that later as a master only change. David