Re: BUG #19438: segfault with temp_file_limit inside cursor
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: kuzmin.db4@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-03-29T23:41:37Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 at 04:32, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Here's a fleshed-out version of the requested_size method.
> I noted that AllocSetRealloc needs a defense too, and then
> extended the patch to generation.c and slab.c. bump.c
> doesn't have an issue, and I don't think alignedalloc.c
> needs its own defense either: it can rely on the underlying
> context type.
Thanks for writing that up.
I looked at the code and tested. The only thing that I noted was
GenerationFree(), where we do:
/* Test for previously-freed chunk */
if (unlikely(chunk->requested_size == InvalidAllocSize))
elog(WARNING, "detected double pfree in %s %p",
((MemoryContext) block->context)->name, chunk);
/* Test for someone scribbling on unused space in chunk */
Assert(chunk->requested_size < chunksize);
I expect you've likely thought of this, but if we do spit out the
warning there, then the Assert is definitely going to fail, as
InvalidAllocSize is defined as SIZE_MAX. I don't know if that means
it's worth deviating from the similar WARNINGs you've added and making
that one an ERROR. There's certainly no guarantee with the other
context that we'll not crash sometime very soon after issuing the
warning anyway, so maybe it's fine.
David
Commits
-
Be more careful to preserve consistency of a tuplestore.
- 739477345036 19 (unreleased) landed
- adb7873bb933 18.4 landed
- 811f3263a48d 15.18 landed
- 7cd23aad2a7a 14.23 landed
- 59c139d53be3 16.14 landed
- 1f5b6a5e5d74 17.10 landed
-
Detect pfree or repalloc of a previously-freed memory chunk.
- a26ac902f662 16.14 landed
- 3f3eefc28892 18.4 landed
- 0c8b4e9cfc45 17.10 landed
- 095555daf124 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve performance of and reduce overheads of memory management
- c6e0fe1f2a08 16.0 cited