Re: Some ExecSeqScan optimizations

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>

Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>

Date: 2025-01-10T10:37:55Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Refactor ExecScan() to allow inlining of its core logic
- fb9f955025f7 18.0 landed

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 at 22:22, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 1:06 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I can look if performance tests show
> > that it might be worthwhile considering.
>
> Sure, that would be great.

What I wanted to know was if 0002 shows any additional gains over just
0001. If there isn't any, I didn't see the point in looking at it.

David