Re: Properly pathify the union planner
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-08T03:30:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 00:39, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to have another look, but it might take several days. > Would that be too late? Please look. Several days is fine. I'd like to start looking on Monday or Tuesday next week. Thanks David
Commits
-
Don't adjust ressortgroupref in generate_setop_child_grouplist()
- 7487044d6ccf 17.0 landed
-
Don't zero tuple_fraction when planning UNIONs with ORDER BYs
- 3b1a7eb28930 17.0 landed
-
Fix assert failure when planning setop subqueries with CTEs
- d5d2205c8ddc 17.0 landed
-
Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION
- 66c0185a3d14 17.0 landed
-
Simplify PathKey checking code
- 0c444a70f2a7 17.0 landed
-
Clarify the 'rows' parameter in create_append_path
- 87027cb55bf7 17.0 landed