Re: [PATCH] Fix hashed ScalarArrayOp semantics for NULL LHS with non-strict comparators
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan@outlook.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2026-04-23T05:32:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thanks for looking. On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 at 16:31, Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan@outlook.com> wrote: > One possible improvement, though not > a blocker, would be to defer the lhs-NULL handling until we actually > encounter the first NULL on the lhs. That could avoid a bit of extra > work in the common case where the lhs contains no NULLs. I thought of it, but didn't do it as it meant having to keep a bit more state to track if we've filled the cache yet, plus the extra costs incurred to check if we've done it yet that would have to be paid for every NULL lookup. We currently have to check if the hash table has been set up already, so I felt more comfortable installing the new code in with that. David
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix incorrect logic for hashed IN / NOT IN with non-strict operators
- 109de35b705c 14.23 landed
- 622f8b53014e 15.18 landed
- a2a0060d5d8f 16.14 landed
- 3fda3e12f41b 17.10 landed
- 035c520db866 18.4 landed
- 94219a73f79d 19 (unreleased) landed