Re: Why is parula failing?

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, tharar@amazon.com
Date: 2024-03-21T00:53:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 12:36, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So yeah, if we could have log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 perhaps
> that would yield a clue.

FWIW, I agree with your earlier statement about it looking very much
like auto-vacuum has run on that table, but equally, if something like
the pg_index record was damaged we could get the same plan change.

We could also do something like the attached just in case we're
barking up the wrong tree.

David

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"

  2. Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test

  3. Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables